|
fridge.
May 24, 2006 0:16:23 GMT -5
Post by kitchencabinet on May 24, 2006 0:16:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
fridge.
May 24, 2006 10:53:55 GMT -5
Post by SINISTER FUNKHOUSE on May 24, 2006 10:53:55 GMT -5
GET THESE MOTHAFUCKIN' SNAKES OFF THIS PLANE!
i can't wait.
i saw the da vinci code on friday. it sucks.
i'm going to see united 93 this week. anyone else see it? i hear it's great. i saw the tv movie and it was good.
|
|
|
fridge.
May 24, 2006 12:47:41 GMT -5
Post by kevin on May 24, 2006 12:47:41 GMT -5
united 93? no thanks. im not paying money to watch a movie that is a complete misrepresentation of what actually happened. its just more propagranda that tries to convice people that our government had no role in the "attacks".
|
|
|
fridge.
May 24, 2006 12:56:12 GMT -5
Post by SINISTER FUNKHOUSE on May 24, 2006 12:56:12 GMT -5
i think the evidence is overwhelming on BOTH arguments. because of this, i don't really have an opinion on what REALLY happened. if the government had no role in the attacks, except for the president being told that america would be attacked by osama before it happed, then it seems pretty accurate.
i don't see it as a political movie, anyhow. i saw the tv version, and it was really good. it didn't tell us anything we didn't already know, but it was very moving. when sept. 11 really happened, to be really honest, i wasn't THAT moved. i was more shocked, and then started to care less and less. after seeing the tv movie, i have a lot more sympathy than i used to.
|
|
ihaveaflamegun
Go Away
ΔMi⁻¹ = −αΣn=1NDi[n][Σj∈C[i]Fji[n − 1] + Fexti[n⁻¹]]
Posts: 292
|
fridge.
May 24, 2006 23:43:31 GMT -5
Post by ihaveaflamegun on May 24, 2006 23:43:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
fridge.
May 25, 2006 0:59:03 GMT -5
Post by TheDeadTexan on May 25, 2006 0:59:03 GMT -5
United 93 was an incredible movie. It wasn't pro-US policial propaganda. If you want that, then go watch Oliver Stone's bullshit 9/11 movie. They even got some of the real people who were in the traffic control towers to play themselves in United 93. Whatever bullshit conspiracy theories you have of what happened on September 11, please save them. They've been debunked a million times. Watching Loose Change will be losing 90 minutes of your life you will never get back. If you have the patience to watch that, then read these articles: Loose Change AnalysisRead this tooThis tooThis tooOh, and this too
|
|
|
fridge.
May 25, 2006 1:21:00 GMT -5
Post by SINISTER FUNKHOUSE on May 25, 2006 1:21:00 GMT -5
yeah i saw it. i didn't think it was very convincing though.
|
|
|
fridge.
May 25, 2006 1:21:34 GMT -5
Post by SINISTER FUNKHOUSE on May 25, 2006 1:21:34 GMT -5
United 93 was an incredible movie. It wasn't pro-US policial propaganda. If you want that, then go watch Oliver Stone's bullshit 9/11 movie. They even got some of the real people who were in the traffic control towers to play themselves in United 93. Whatever bullshit conspiracy theories you have of what happened on September 11, please save them. They've been debunked a million times. Watching Loose Change will be losing 90 minutes of your life you will never get back. If you have the patience to watch that, then read these articles: Loose Change AnalysisRead this tooThis tooThis tooOh, and this tooi like you.
|
|
byronhulcher
Go Away
and I'm waiting for him to arrive.
Posts: 482
|
fridge.
May 25, 2006 6:46:24 GMT -5
Post by byronhulcher on May 25, 2006 6:46:24 GMT -5
|
|
ihaveaflamegun
Go Away
ΔMi⁻¹ = −αΣn=1NDi[n][Σj∈C[i]Fji[n − 1] + Fexti[n⁻¹]]
Posts: 292
|
fridge.
May 25, 2006 10:24:59 GMT -5
Post by ihaveaflamegun on May 25, 2006 10:24:59 GMT -5
here's another 911 video link specifically dealing with how the official story in regards to fall of the two towers is scientifically impossible. its a speech from jeff king, an engineer at MIT (i did a quicks search and couldn't come up with any info on him besides this video. he wasn't on the MIT people directory either.) video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8533904938803031452&pl=truealso, here is a site which has arguments against his--> www.geocities.com/debunking911/
|
|