|
|
prols
Feb 17, 2004 19:38:26 GMT -5
Post by dusted review on Feb 17, 2004 19:38:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
prols
Feb 17, 2004 19:41:24 GMT -5
Post by prols on Feb 17, 2004 19:41:24 GMT -5
that should read "dusted review" in the subject line. a better, more in-depth review than the typical pitchfork praise
|
|
|
|
prols
Feb 17, 2004 19:42:35 GMT -5
Post by lhjf on Feb 17, 2004 19:42:35 GMT -5
dusted, you get the idea. my bald  |
|
|
|
prols
Feb 18, 2004 0:13:44 GMT -5
Post by theron on Feb 18, 2004 0:13:44 GMT -5
"Stewart claims he has been listening mostly to contemporary classical music and pop; the former influence is hard to hear..."
Are you kidding me? Who is this guy that wrote this review? Does he know anything about music?
|
|
|
|
prols
Feb 18, 2004 9:18:25 GMT -5
Post by wesleyan on Feb 18, 2004 9:18:25 GMT -5
i know the reviewer, he's an ace musicologist from Wesleyan. Knows a sh*t load more than I do, I'll say that
|
|
